DEFENDING GOD'S WORD ONLINE - 02_06

social_media_nav_bar

SHARE THIS ARTICLE WITH YOUR FRIENDS and FOLLOW

Part 6 of 6 - LOST in the CONFUSED MIND of a FORMER KJV-ONLY TURNED PENTECOSTAL BIBLE COLLEGE STUDENT

LOST 00 (intro): LOST 01: LOST 02: LOST 03: LOST 04: LOST 05 (Summary): LOST 06:

From: "DH"
Sent: January-15-10 2:20 PM
To: Mike
Subject: RE: Before you leave, "DH" .......

I take plagiarism very seriously. I have no idea who "Dr. [Name Edited]" is. Everything I wrote was my own thoughts. Thank you, however, for discrediting me once again based upon your wrong assumptions.

By your past responses, it is evident that you have refused to honestly consider anything I have shared with you such as the KJV contradiction in Acts. This is as plain as can be and yet you seek for any reason to ignore it (eisegesis rather than exegesis). You have closed your eyes to the truth and no man can open them but yourself, and that only by the Lord's grace. That is why this conversation is futile.

May God bless you in all truth inasmuch as you desire it!

"DH"

May the Lamb that was slain receive the reward of His suffering!

From: Mike
Sent: January-16-10 9:19 AM
To: "DH"
Subject: RE: Before you leave, "DH" .......

"DH",

1. Thank you. God has blessed me with much truth. But there continues to be something terribly wrong with the communication between you and me. If you are having difficulty then please be honest with me and don't pretend that all is well with you. I have been corresponding with you in faith that you have accurately portrayed yourself to me and are competent in discussing the issues set before us. However, there are several facts that are inconsistent with this picture:

a. You are NOT presently enrolled in any courses at [Name Edited]. (Perhaps that is why you appeared to be annoyed when I asked whether you had assignments to prepare or exams to study for). (It also may be a reason for why you are so bitter; although there could be many other reasons.)

b. You should be aware that Dr. [Name Edited], D.Min is the Dean of Undergraduate Studies at [Name Edited], the head of the Undergraduate School of Bible and Theology where you claimed to be "presently a ministerial student, majoring in Bible and Theology at [Name Edited] (an AG school)".

c. But you say you "have no idea who "Dr. [Name Edited]" is".

d. The fact that you don't know the name of the head of your ministerial school department seems odd to me. It is something that I would certainly know, if I were enrolled there.

e. The fact that you misread Dr. [Name Edited] name and called him "[Different Name Edited]" indicates to me that perhaps you have not been able to read and/or to process the information that I sent to you. (At the least, you are not a careful reader). This would explain your refusal or inability to respond to the documentation and questions that I sent to you. If this is the case, please be honest with me about it, and I will be able to modify my correspondence with you accordingly.

f. You say that I discredited you once again, and you say that I made wrong assumptions, but you haven't said what I have done to warrant either of these accusations.

g. You raised the issue of plagiarism when I had said nothing about such a thing. Why are you writing to me about plagiarism? What does plagiarism have to do with anything that we have discussed?

h. You are accusing me of not honestly considering anything that you have shared with me such as the KJV contradiction in Acts. "DH", I wrote about this in great detail and fully answered the supposed contradiction about whether_the_men_with_Paul_hear_a_voice_or_not (Acts 9:7 and Acts 22:9) in my email dated 13 Jan 2010. There is no contradiction at all in the text of the King James Bible. Did you read the text? Did you understand my answer? To accuse me of this is like insisting that the world is flat when the evidence is well known to the contrary. Why would you do that?

i. You use vocabulary and sentence structure from time to time that would indicate a mature ability to reason and converse, and yet you only respond to me with the opinions that someone once taught you. You have never responded to my evidence, you have never answered my questions and you have never responded to my documented analysis of your questions.

j. Are you capable of answering my_simple_questions_in_the_chart? Why won't you?

k. Are you still trying to tell me that Acts 22:9 contradicts Acts 9:7 in the King James Bible? Did you READ my answer to you? Did you UNDERSTAND it? Do you know what the words, "of him that spake to me" mean, in the context of "they heard not THE VOICE of him that spake to me"? Do you understand that the words "of him that spake to me" describe WHICH voice the men DIDN'T hear?

2. I am not one who gives up quickly on people. You initiated a conversation with me and I expect honest answers from you at the very least.

3. Please honestly respond to these facts about your course load at [Name Edited], and please answer the questions in my chart with the same effort that I made in giving a detailed reply to your questions.

Mike.

GO TO PREVIOUS:

LOST 00 (intro): LOST 01: LOST 02: LOST 03: LOST 04: LOST 05 (Summary): LOST 06: